Notice there is no denial of WB working on a deal for ERHC. Moreover, you have countless times bragged of your relationship with same. I'm glad you had the integrity not to lie and indicate WB is not working on a deal as this poster believes he knows better. Sadly, this is likely why WB resigned....more money brokering a deal which can't be done (and make extra monies) while serving as CEO.
This is a strong indicator of just what kind of deal is on the table. The same group maybe trying a hostile take over as evidenced by this post of Electicks:
Here is further indication that perhaps even a hostile attempt at takeover may be in the works:
"As to my desires to negatively impact the SP I assure you that I hold more shares than most and wish only upside, however I also know more than most and in my opinion the true value of this company will never be realized with SEO in the chairmans seat. I dont even care if they announce the rig contract next week and then strike the friggen mother load, we will never get the same value on assets as other less impaired companies with real management." http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13631834
......all said, it is apparant to me and probably most ERHC shareholders that you are deeply involved with an "association" (your words, not mine) that is trying to gain controlling interest of this stock. In all liklihood, Ex CEO Walter Brandhubber is also involved in this same deal. By all appearances, Sir Emeka Offor is not folding his control of the company to this experienced management team and thus the resorts to slam SEO. Kind of funny a stockholder admitting to owning many millions of shares for many many years and knowing who actually runs the co (read SEO) and then slamming him with your recent comments. Very transparent IMHO.
I am aware of strong rumorings that WB is working on a deal. You obviously are very well aware of same and probably are deeply involved based on your posts. It gives strong indications of just why our sp is what it is today. Not SEO...but this association you speak of and the attempt to takeover controlling interest. It is, and has been, in their (read yours and WB) to hold down ERHC's sp so the deal you can afford to put on the table looks good.
Many of us watched NITE and TDCM sell into each and every run. The sellers appear to have been this association. Each and every run stiffled. Stepped on. BSK's post of perhaps WB putting the SEC and DOJ "may be" not all that far fetched. WB makes sure ERHC is clean then puts the dogs on us in an ugly attempt to hold down our sp all while the association is picking up the shares be sold to add to their many millions of shares for a possible hostile attempt. Interesting concept....especially coming from BSK.
Regardless, you have convinced me that you, ELECTICK, have a very obvious agenda and are currently trying to sell shareholders into believing nobody will ever want ERHC. BS. When theirs oil.....they will and you know it. That is probably why you are acting desperate here....as drilling dates move forward.
Maybe even Oily's "read the details of the deal closely" comments?
No baiting necessary Electick. You bit a baitless hook in your blatant attempt to sell shareholders your agenda...the deal you are working hard at selling.
You, Electic, oversold your agenda.
I always said I would raise the flag here. Its raised and its bright red!!!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
