News Focus
News Focus
icon url

investorpro1

11/27/17 8:07 PM

#45063 RE: nobody12378 #45062

Correct.. I misspoke.. I meant to say that the defendant ;lost....
icon url

ice_n_ak

11/27/17 8:32 PM

#45064 RE: nobody12378 #45062

Words are tricky indeed. Somnolent: a fun word indeed. Thanks for adding that one to my vocabulary.

"Cantor Colburn and Defendants had executed a confidential settlement agreement
that is subject to certain conditions, and that closing of the settlement was expected within the next thirty days. CleanTech maintained that additional settlement issues remain that it will address after settlement between Cantor Colburn and Defendants
is closed.

Yes, I can see that reading the above it does indeed show Cantor Colburn HAS executed a confidential agreement with Defendants. Leading to some speculation...Who does Cantor Colburn represent? Itself? GERS? Both?

Any news regarding GERS is good news at this point and for me, the court filings have painted a good picture for me.

Interesting that a 'confidential' agreement was reached 20 days ago with only ten more remaining (if expectations hold true)

All very interesting and even more interesting will be how any potential investors and present investors deed the filing. Hopefully the stock price will not become 'somnolent'.

Thanks for presenting the filing for public consumption. Dare I say I might regain some of the many dollars lost investing in GERS the past many years? The answer may actually be positive this time...or, not.
icon url

Dutch1

11/28/17 1:54 AM

#45066 RE: nobody12378 #45062

Could it be that as long as not all the defendants settle, C&C is acting as a middlemen for jurisdictional reasons? They are an interested party, due to the deal with GERS IMO. But I can not see how that 15% deal would work, if they would settle just for their own part. Also could it be that GERS has given them the right to work out the complete settlement (between certain bounderies) and that GERS doesn’t get to sign, until all is ready?

Maybe your lawyer/judge son can help on these questions?
icon url

Dutch1

11/28/17 2:41 AM

#45067 RE: nobody12378 #45062

Some more speculation...

I think that CC might be named here, because they will this way receive the windfall on their account, and KK this way might have a construction to get the money to the preferred stockholders and keep it out of the SEC filings.

Also:

I think a settlement would normally be on three points:

- Pay money for the infringement
- Become a paying licensee
- Stop using infringing technology, or would becoming a paying licensee mean you can keep on using the infringing technology?

"Cantor Colburn and Defendants had executed a confidential settlement agreement "

This to me might mean, all defendants seem to have reached an agreement. Not a couple of them.

"CleanTech maintained that additional settlement issues remain that it will address after settlement between Cantor Colburn and Defendants
is closed"

So, it might be that some of the points on above are not completely met. They might struggle for instance on who the patent owns for the technology they use. Could it be that remaining issues are only involving ICP.

I think that after the final filing, we will learn that they will go to court to fight out the unsolved issues. And that after that filing GERS may announce that they have added more licensees to their list.

That will be the moment that GERS starts filing again.
Some money might be added to GERS assets, but most will be added to FCC. And they don't need to file, because they are not publicly traded.

Maybe BTZO also gets a bit more, but since they have not been filing at all, and aren't involved as a party, it might be you'll never hear from them again.

This also might lead to a very slow added value to common shareholders. Of course for the GERS share holders the fact there is a settlement and there might be new licensees and there will be more confidence might help the SP a lot. And If GERS seems to become a solid company, and doesn't need to dilute again, and continuous filing again, it might give them very cheap shares for a potential well earning company.
But... I doubt if it will be what most have hoped for. It might be no quick over $1 return. But a slow and steady long term investment. With a some faster added value in the first few months. And after that all has to unfold, maybe toward a nasdaq trading company?