r-
You do not understand or do not want to understand ... A given chart (e.g. for 3 months, daily, etc.) will be resulted in the same prediction by everybody (assuming all of them know TA), independently from the person.
TA has rules ... x form on a chart predict y "behavior" ... based on x form everybody "have to" conclude y, the form "could not" be interpreted differently, predict different y1, y2, ... "behavior". (e.g. Everybody when see 3 + 3, will say that the result will be 6.) ... Of course, TA isn't so explicit the x form on the chart does not guarantee the behavior but based on history (analysis of millions of charts) the outcome of y is the typical ... but typical does not mean in every cases.
F- did not make any conclusion (in a classical meaning) ... he analyzed the chart (acc. to TA rules, based on forms, etc.) and summarized the result of it.
So, meanwhile you would like to paint it as a challenge of F- it is the deny of TA ... which is fine, you could ... but ask F- why the TA is wrong ... well ...
Best,
G
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
