They the shorts or naked shorter stand to loose in two ways hands down : [1] severe financial losses to rocketed pps to any outstanding upcoming trial data to any one or more IPIX drug candidate arsenal [2] really severe financial compounding to big-pharma partnership with uplisting to higher exchange as well as it changes cusp number and at this point a short might as well hang itself or leap off of a tall building to cover or produce shares at that time.....how sweet it is to be long and strong!!!.....tick-tock , tryz
Actually this was the post in its entirety: "My daily FINRA post is factual. The numbers I posted are quoted directly from the FINRA website. I take it one step further and divide the total volume into the shares the market makers have self reported to FINRA to determine the percentage of the volume that was short sales. I offer nothing more and nothing less than that information on a daily basis. IMO it is obvious that CTIX/IPIX is now and has been for years under attack by short sellers and if you believe me to be insane for claiming that, that is your perogative but I think you are daydreaming. I did state that the shorts did not have to cover because of the name and cusip change and that was proven to be true as there was no cover. The shorts will however be forced to cover if we uplist. That does not mean they won't attack again to try and recover some of their losses but once we have moved to a higher exchange we should have proved we belong there and will have multiple institutional investors owning a good sized percentage of the outstanding shares. The shorts are going to lose big here because IPIX has savvy management and outstanding science.. Go IPIX!!!
Now could you post the link to what you claim Leo said about the shorts covering based on the cusip and name change please. Thank you. Go IPIX!!!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
