OK Anders, I'll take your outlier theory one step further. What if it meant they are intending to disclose (aka: unblind) formerly conducted (if conducted) interim results first. Even a bigger stretch, but it shows one how vague the language in the 8K is. It's like a rorschach test.
(It's funny, somewhere in the recesses of my memory from long ago I remember someone posting(?) 'I wonder how so and so would like it if the prior IA results were announced first').
Again, this is a huge stretch in my book, but there you go.