News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Finding the Truth

09/08/17 10:44 PM

#133668 RE: meirluc #133665

Thanks for the responses. Since they don't need to tell us the data is locked than my guess it's happening now.

"The mOS of the trial arm probably has not been established since it most likely extends beyond 22 months thus longer than the 22 months that have passed since the last patient was randomized."

Who's too say we are not at the median OS for the control group and trial arm. The last patient was randomized 22 months ago. Most of the others people are above 22 months start time. Meaning median of OS is already higher than 22 months (most likely). Also let's keep in mind that 90 percent of the people got the vaccine. It's really a single arm study of late vaccine people vs early for OS. Also I can't imagine Linda wanting to keep the trial going much longer with the finical situation that NWBO is in.
icon url

biosectinvestor

09/09/17 8:21 AM

#133690 RE: meirluc #133665

If I were in their shoes, and had waited ten years and so much was at stake, it would just make sense to do it, if that were the best option to ensure success and the best reimbursement measure. They've shown they are not in a rush to dilute shareholders and have been able to extend and extend out as necessary with current expenditures. If they take it out a bit longer, that's just the way it is going to be. I don't claim I know they are going to do that or even if it's likely, but if it is done, I get the logic. There is simply too much at stake at this stage to be driven by the anxiousness of persons who don't understand and don't care, but are simply impatient for riches.
icon url

hankmanhub

09/10/17 12:50 PM

#133801 RE: meirluc #133665

For arguments sake, lets say I agree with what you are saying - BUT WHY CAN NWBO NOT ANNOUNCE THAT THAT THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE DOING, thus easing the nerves of their shareholders?