News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ou71764

09/06/17 10:47 PM

#133275 RE: Evaluate #133274

...there were 85 alive, how can there be 3 additional people alive



Let's ask Lazarus and see if he responds!
icon url

abeta

09/06/17 11:40 PM

#133281 RE: Evaluate #133274

To me it appears that your 2 charts do not jive:



Shortest answer - You are RIGHT.

Short answer -

The 98 ALIVE are from a data table of 331 records within which
the 98 ALIVE are identified.

END OF STORY

-------------------------------

The 100 Alive is a hand created worksheet reflecting where
we are at RIGHT NOW. as we head towards the 98 ALIVE.

It is --NOT-- supported by any underlying records.

Its usefulness is -

-- (All these numbers are GUESSES) -

1) It talks to how many of the ALIVE have NOT PROGRESSED. - 71
2) It talks to how many of the ALIVE TREATMENT have NOT PROGRESSED. 61
3) It talks to how many of the ALIVE are SOC. 15
4) It talks to how many of the ALIVE SOC have NOT PROGRESSED. 10

5) It SUCKS because there is no TIME PERSPECTIVE.

-------------------------------

So -

I MODIFIED the 98 ALIVE and used number (4) above

4) The ALIVE SOC that have NOT PROGRESSED. 10

The balance - which is 88 - according to me - are all treatment.
They all received DCVAX.

I am hesitant to split the treatment into 2 groups i.e.

61 Treatment - Not Progressed - (from the 100 Alive logic)
27 Treatment - Progressed - (I don't know what this means)

You don't have to accept any of these numbers.

I think meirluc is smart - and I wanted to put his thoughts
in a worksheet.

In doing so, I have bought into the supposition that

1) Some of the CONTROL are ALIVE and have not progressed.
2) And this required me to alter the 98 Alive into 2 groups.
3) The 2 events we are waiting for have no effect on any of this.

We are waiting for 98 ALIVE.