There should still be $100M "floating around". The $45M due to CA. $14M owed from TRW. $18M fish pond. $6M invested in FF2. And there are probably some things I'm forgetting about.
We were also reminded yesterday that the $21M credit facility isn't a loan to SIAF but to the distribution center. And the other 2 loans only add up to $7M or $8M.
The good thing about TRW is also, if they ramp up, once they have the cash, they should be able to pay SIAF upfront. If they have the cash, why the hell not? So the cash flow situation there shouldn't hold us back. Once they receive funding.
Overall, I maintain that there should be room for cash dividends.
"Really funny that they are able to have one of the most detailed financial reports out there and are not able to be more clear about this"
If you still have not noticed, the whole section " Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Plan of Operations" is missing. My guess is that ECOVIS or the lawyers did not like what they wrote in this section, like too frisky forward looking statements, or speculating about things they can not prove/guarantee.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
