Replies to post #39507 on Tauriga Sciences Inc (fka TAUG)

[loanranger]

"I would imagine all the depositions are positive for TAUG."

So would I if I worked for the company. It's called a bias and it has been known to affect one's imagination.

[rawman]

I would imagine all the depositions are positive for TAUG. This is an open and shut case of negligence and cover up with multiple rule violations so it would be hard to imagine anything but bad news for Cowan in the depositions.

This post is a PERFECT EXAMPLE of a COMPANY PAID CONSULTANT, JOHNNY C, posting BLATANT AND UNSUPPORTED SPECULATION!

BTW...YOU "IMAGINE" WRONG! It will be most interesting to someday see Seth Shaw's deposition, where he explains why TAUG was being touted as a "functional" on-going enterprise, even though it had no business, no products, no assets and was tens of millions in debt, when the Cowan error was first made public in July 2015! Stella Sung's deposition, if she has done one, would also add to the discussion! What damages? There was nothing to "damage"! Think about any BOD members, who might have had to answer, "Why was auditor retained, when it was a sixth consecutive audit, which would violate the auditor independence rules?" The BOD, with its fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders, is supposed to be paying attention! (Also, in this vein, it appears TAUG carries no Officer, Executive, and/or Director insurance coverage! If the shareholders wanted to "get nasty", it could get interesting!)