Replies to post #39486 on Tauriga Sciences Inc (fka TAUG)

[Johnny_C]

It should be something watching Cowan's ex compliance guy testify as to what he told Partners what he thought should have been done and then hearing that "likeable" (cough cough) guy Don Cowan actually did and his reasoning. It will be interesting to hear Cowan's testimony to what a reasonable person would think a significant threat is and why the rules were not followed.

What do you think Cowan's excuse will be for failing to even inform TAURIGA after they agreed to a censure by the PCAOB in the Spring of 2015. Or how Cowan thought he could "reissue" the 2014 opinion after agreeing to a censure.

This is not a run of the mill negligence case, a run of the mill negligence case would not put a company out of the auditing business!

[diannedawn]

Isn't the key word here "some"?

Some are posted on TAUG's website.

One would have to wonder if they only provide things that they think supports their case?
And what about the self described "consultant" telling STORIES of things that allegedly occurred in court, but refusing to ever provide PROOF?
If I had a transcript of a hearing, I would be posting a link to it, or at least pics of the pages that PROVED the things I was claiming....

This doesn't happen with the STORIES told by the the "consultant", Mr. "BOD Thomas Graham, or even Seth Shaw.

Statements are made and PROOF IS NOT PROVIDED....
People are just expected to take their "word" for it.
And I am not talking about opinions of things that might occur...
I am talking about definitive statements about things that allegedly occurred....
These things SHOULD be able to be PROVED.

Sadly, their "word" has tended to be far from accurate...
Is the venue Florida?

How's jury selection going?

ROTFLMAO

[rawman]

Some are posted on TAUG's website.

LOL! The Meyler deposition is the only deposition posted on the Tauriga Sciences website! It is not "some", it is one! Why only one? Of course the posted deposition was PERSONALLY SELECTED by CEO Seth Shaw! Most would refer to this action as being "self-serving"!

Is Seth Shaw's deposition posted on the TAUG website? In the name of transparency and fairness...why not? Hmmm....indeed "self-serving"!