Bob I am merely evaluating what you are posting. You seem to want certain things to happen and make statements like “What's even sadder is that most posters (ie Naples, Rosie) over there would rather waste time bashing each other than responding to the points I raised.”
Yet the minute someone does respond to your posts you want to attack the messenger. However, I am use to be attacked when I respond to someone’s post. But you have opened a can of worms not me I am merely doing what you wanted and responding to the issues you have raised.
Now that post got my interest because you went on to state “My RFP (Reason For Posting) is I know management has got to read these threads - so I'm trying to provide sentiment & criticism, albeit constructive, so that tg & co. can pick up on some of our expectations and, if not totally powerless to act, fulfill some of them for a change!!!
As for level of interest, I still hold shares and turned many friends/colleagues onto this stock. So, for mine, their and your sakes, a thread that isn't filled with garbage is one of our only”
That sent off a few flags like why you use the word “OUR” in the expectation phrase and the fulfill some of them for a change especially the last sentence which then lead to not the shareholders but “our” meant your personal sake and associates or whatever because you refer to us as ‘YOUR” in the sakes phrase..
I just sat back and waited since it looked like you were about to get on a TMI roll and sure enough you did and thus you stated “My beef with tg (and where I feel he really screwed me) is how he told us that he had this big contingent of buyers (ie Power, Lyons, others) who were going to step to the plate in a big way this summer.”
Now no matter how you twist this as to what you meant or how the information came to you it would be considered inside information. It is also material event information for the future that you could capitalize on should big buyers come stepping in. However it was originally interpreted that you got this back in January and later you state it was not Jan but in fact May just a few weeks ago, because you stated “4. I made a large open market purchase at the end of May that added to my position substantially” Which appears to be weeks before the summer which was suppose to have “big contingent of buyers” Yet you state this is not inside trading.
But then you go further stating, “What I do mind is when the company screws the financier/PR.” Which means you apparently are part of a this and if a PR then 17B applies. But you admit to front loading IMO because of this statement, “Don't encourage shareholders toload the boat with stock and get sucked in to the "critical mass" pitch, waiting for for a big push while you fabricate some story about buyers that don't exist.” Apparently you were going to DUMP into the big forth coming PUSH.
Now as I continue on with your issues you have raised I can’t help but show you also stated, “Well, he may have screwed me & my boys” and even more “i don't know how many of us are completely sold out (i'm not, for example), but I'm sure this will continue until the liquidity/absorption picks up.” Absorption I take you mean buyers that you and your boys (syndication) are selling into.
I find this type of rhetoric interesting when you compare the events you have posted to the anatomy of a P&D. Now this type of manipulation is a bit different that what you are refering to in your statement, “imo, this form of manipulation (ie making up stories and burning bridges and maddening key shareholders) is the fastest way to get all capital choked off from the company. By never giving someone who stuck with you during the lean times a reward (by bringing in buyers, slowing the dilution, getting price up, etc.) of some profit taking is either stupid/really greedy.” I find this very interesting that you are upset that you and the syndicate were not rewarded.
Doubt you no I do not I believe you when you state, “the story that I'm telling is not conjecture. it just happened to my financial advisor with AV, and I can personally vouch for being part of the screw-job and knowing the blow-by-blow secondhand.”
Now if you start to look at the over all we have a syndication, financial advisor, know of a push coming and a loading the boat. UM these are your words not mine and I am merely responding to your issues but you go even further.
You state, “instead of rewarding the savior by letting him out with his money intact (maybe to roll over the investment), he issues a ton of friggin' stock and even more saying, “but after jacking his latest financier” … Now take all this as the syndication you belong to is the lastest financier.
Not until this post did I really perk up to what you are putting out when you stated, “Financing and support were delivered (see runs) while we took on (I don't know exactly) somewhere in the neighborhood of 15 million shares] - I took a million myself, the distribution and financing happened, [/b and he never followed through with these "heavy hitters" or "long term" funding.”
Now comes the question to the “took a million shares myself” so you clarify all this even further with your list, which definitely contradicts what you started out conveying. But do not disclose the basis for your cost and you claim you bought in the open market. So now I am confused totally at what financing was delivered and for how much stock, how much of the 15M was bought in the open market on a prelude to heavy hitters and even more what PR was suppose to happen and the compensation for the PR.
So now I bring up the point that a group syndication or whatever especially one with a financial advisor falls under the 13 d filing rule you reply back “Generally, these transactions are arranged for in a staged, staggered manner and diversified so as to avoid 5% ownership disclosure hassles and limitations.
I am only responding to the issues you are raising and flaming for actually reading your posts and making comments does not agree with your initial post that people should. Catch 22 I guess. But I cannot and will not have sympathy for a financier or PR that bought a massive (load the boat) scenario through a syndication and got burned.
Hey maybe I am misinterpreting what you are posting but it sure looks like you front loaded through information through a FA on heavy hitters where financing and PR (not sure what this is unless it is one of the newsletters or maybe the 1.5M newsletter that came out last) etc.
You just have my curiosity up big time and it grows the more you disclose especially when you make this statement, “In all my years, I have never seen 13Ds or Fs filed for an OTC BB, despite hundreds of financings I have been involved with/arranged for over the years.”
I think you are being extremely articulate in what and who you are and your involvement in this stock .
I have to agree with SMOUCH when you first came on … something is not right in Denmark.
:=) Gary Swancey
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
