Replies to post #122466 on DD Support Board and Research Team

[janice shell]

I don't see what the point would be. And yes, it would be illegal.

[stockmasterflash]

Thanks. I'm not sure they couldn't legally get away with programming in 'encouragement' to either increase or decrease inventory based on various technical factors - maybe overall money inflows or something like that are monitored. If so, then it may be that multiple mms have similar programs which ends up creating cycles in the overall penny market. Same effect as obvious illegal collusion. Not 'evil' but still a mm-driven cycle

And there has never been a discgruntled employee turned whistleblower in all of this time. SEC and the Exchanges which have actve surveilance systems have never detected it. (they've detected insider trading 2 and 3 degrees removed from the tippee yet they can't discover THIS obvious scam?) Wikileaks has never gotten evidence of it.

But the iHubbers who perennially lose their asses on obvious scams know this

Have you ever seen a scam through from mania, to bagholding, to enforcement action? The stories, the legends, the bogeymen are always the same.

[Monksdream]

If I knew a money game was rigged I wouldn't participate, because I know the odds are stacked against me.

I'm attempting to get my arms around the point you're attempting to make.

If you believe the OTC market is rigged, this iHub message forum isn't where you begin the process of reforming it.