News Focus
News Focus
icon url

eiddle

06/17/17 5:03 PM

#64861 RE: drugmanrx #64860

Just post what is written, FACTS, and not out of context and incomplete without references.

I just posted the rest of them from 10-K's .
Its for the reader to use. FACTS.

Forgive me, I did leave off the "ERC development to date" , not intentially, just by mistake.

EOM...EOM...EOM...EOM...EOM...


What does the 10k and 10q from 2013 and 2014 have to do with this post that deals where the technology is at in 10Q from 6/5/2017?



It there for reference.
icon url

Big daddy wags

06/17/17 5:33 PM

#64862 RE: drugmanrx #64860

What is your point in all of this back and forth over the 80% nonsense? Are you saying that the claim that the ERC is 80% efficient means that the mvtg technology is ready for Prime Time and ready to sell a licensed product??
Is that what you are saying?
Because if that is what you are saying then why were you begging the Prime Minister of Canada for funds to get the ERC/MRFC out of the lab and into a commercially viable product??
These are really the only questions that are meaningful at this point!!!
I would certainly appreciate an answer to these questions!!!
So let me recap the questions:

1. Does mvtg have a technology that is ready for sale through licensing fees?

2. Does mvtg need more money to get the technology out of the lag and get it to a point where it can be licensed for sale??

3. Why would Larry be put in charge of mantra to continue to develop the technology if it is ready to license for commercial use???

Feel free to respond as well Mike!
I would love your feedback as well!

icon url

Big daddy wags

06/17/17 10:31 PM

#64872 RE: drugmanrx #64860

I think you owe it to all the investors here to answer my proposed questions here.

Are you saying that the claim that the ERC is 80% efficient means that the mvtg technology is ready for Prime Time and ready to sell a licensed product??
Is that what you are saying?

Because if that is what you are saying then why were you begging the Prime Minister of Canada for funds to get the ERC/MRFC out of the lab and into a commercially viable product??

These are really the only questions that are meaningful at this point!!!
I would certainly appreciate an answer to these questions!!! And surely the investors have a right to hear the explanation. If you have no answer then just be forthright and say so.
So let me recap the questions:

1. Does mvtg have a technology that is ready for sale through licensing fees?

2. Does mvtg need more money to get the technology out of the lab and get it to a point where it can be licensed for sale??

3. Why would Larry be put in charge of mantra to continue to develop the technology if it is ready to license for commercial use???

Feel free to respond as well Mike!
I'm sure everyone would appreciate your input as well. Hope you are not afraid to answer!