InvestorsHub Logo

Zorro

09/08/06 4:31 PM

#70024 RE: Rufus Paul Harris #70019

Can you believe the trash we've had to put up with? Well, I guess you can you already know some of them. LOL.

jgbuz

09/08/06 4:31 PM

#70025 RE: Rufus Paul Harris #70019

Charlie48

09/08/06 4:32 PM

#70026 RE: Rufus Paul Harris #70019

lol Ruf - you missed his last question

bluediamonds

09/08/06 4:33 PM

#70029 RE: Rufus Paul Harris #70019

RUFUS CRUSHES DIMENSION!

Posted by: Dimension
In reply to: Rufus Paul Harris who wrote msg# 69972 Date:9/8/2006 4:20:51 PM
Post #of 70016

-Why are you afraid to now accept your own challenge to debate OutStreet? Do you admit defeat before the battle? tsk tsk tsk

-Did you recieve a C&D letter from HSWF?

-What's the deal with Mensah, is AISS still your flagship JV? Does he really not know what he is talking about?

-Did you not state already that the Merger was done/complete? if so, can you explain what is going on here really? what's this merger completion date all about?

-Has the SEC been peforming an informal inquiry or investigation of CSHD?


http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13198735

Posted by: Rufus Paul Harris
In reply to: Dimension who wrote msg# 69982 Date:9/8/2006 4:29:10 PM
Post #of 70016

You are as stupid as he is, I am not going to agree to the term that I will not serve him papers. HEHEHEHE

You can not C&D a filed security action, another DA question.

Mensah, why don’t you ask him?

Merger was complete and voted for by the majority, just had to get all of the paperwork done.

I hope so, I will take it to the max with that one, I would bet they are looking at almost every trade. Heck we are, HEHEHEHE

GODSPEED shareholders
Rufus Paul Harris
Chief Executive Officer
Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp
770-420-8270


http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=13199051

serfdom

09/08/06 4:34 PM

#70032 RE: Rufus Paul Harris #70019

Thank you for touching on my question Mr. Harris.

You just told us:

"You can not C&D a filed security action, another DA question."

Does this mean that CSHD still has full access to the $1.3 billion in secured financing from Mr. Canady's group? If Mr. Canady decided to deny CSHD access to the bonds for failure to obtain payment from your company, I don't believe the cease and desist would even be necessary. It's not a legal matter - it's merely a business decision on his part, as it relates to fullfillment of the terms of any contracts the two of you signed.

Regards
Andrew.

schadenfreude

09/08/06 4:35 PM

#70037 RE: Rufus Paul Harris #70019

Has the SEC informed you about an informal investigation of the company? Yes or no, please. I'm sure there are many shareholders who would like to know the answer to this question.

Peaser

09/08/06 4:36 PM

#70039 RE: Rufus Paul Harris #70019

STOCKLEMON CHALLENGES RUFUS TO PROVE OWNERSHIP OF BONDS OR CASH. IF RUFUS CAN PROVE OWNERSHIP WE WILL MAKE A PUBLIC APOLOGY. STOCKLEMON IS CONFIDENT THAT RUFUS WILL BE QUIET ON THIS ISSUE.

Looks like there's no honest takers to this task.



rick85284

09/08/06 4:37 PM

#70040 RE: Rufus Paul Harris #70019

Rufus, instead of sparing with the folks you don't like, why not just answer the questions for the benefit of many here who are invested.

Dimension

09/08/06 4:43 PM

#70053 RE: Rufus Paul Harris #70019

Thanks much...i think there is plenty to read into here.

i'll take a first stab at translating more clearly as to what you likely meant by your dodgy answers:

You are as stupid as he is, I am not going to agree to the term that I will not serve him papers. HEHEHEHE
"i am afraid as i am highschool drop out and hustler that can't hold my liquor...how can i be expected to hold my own in a debate of the facts. Besides, i can't prove anything, that is why i now have egg on my face for not being able to back up my talk...oh, me and my freakin big mouth."

*You can not C&D a filed security action, another DA question.
"I did recieve it, but i am going to claim it is not legal. Yes, that does mean they are backing out of the deal and we no longer have a billion in funny money...but heck, it was NOT a legal C&D, does that count for anything?"

Mensah, why don’t you ask him?
"Everything that mensah stated is true, so help me God."

Merger was complete and voted for by the majority, just had to get all of the paperwork done.
"Yes, i lied and i am likely to get sued now, but hey, this is some damn good scotch i'm drinking"

I hope so, I will take it to the max with that one, I would bet they are looking at almost every trade. Heck we are
We're up sh*t's creek without a paddle. The SEC ARE investigating and, *hic*, houston, we have a problem.

HEHEHEHE
-i picked that up from my good buddy T, and man, am i buzzin right now

Did i get all that right?


just my opinion, jokes, etc...



Dimension

09/09/06 10:35 AM

#70584 RE: Rufus Paul Harris #70019

ALERT: RUFUS IS PUTTING SHAREHOLDERS AT GREAT RISK

Question: Why are you afraid to now accept your own challenge to debate OutStreet? Do you admit defeat before the battle? tsk tsk tsk

Rufus: You are as stupid as he is, I am not going to agree to the term that I will not serve him papers. HEHEHEHE


Interpretation: Rufus is terribly afraid of a factual debate with OurStreet and is unable to show proof for anything he has stated thus far. It is likely he may have been a bit tipsy at the time he made the challenge and has now been forced to squirm out of it. This clearly indicates that the CEO of CSHD is NOT a man of his word, and in fact, appears to be a coward as well as someone that lacks the intelligence and facts to defend his company.


Question: Did you receive a C&D letter from HSWF?

Rufus: You can not C&D a filed security action, another DA question.


Interpretation: It appears by this “dodgy” answer, Rufus is in fact acknowledging receipt of the C&D order, putting an end to the hold-out by his disciples that the C&D was doctored. Given that the C&D is real and was sent by HSWF, we can assume that that source of funding is no more or is in a state of dispute, which likely renders it unusable. In fact, in subsequent posts on this matter, Rufus appears to have stated brashly, that he has no intention of returning or releasing what he believes to be his claim to these bonds. To some astute observers, this is analogous to a stalking boyfriend that just can not accept that the relationship is over. This could spell disaster for shareholders, as the next logical step here would be for HSWF to file suit or pursue other more drastic means of ending this relationship, such as getting the authorities involved or contacting the SEC themselves. A lawsuit is the last thing shareholders of this company needs at this moment. Additionally, I worry now that Rufus is making enemies from all sides. To pretend you are a heroic warrior capable of defending your ship from all sides is a nice fantasy, but not practical in the corporate world. It is my belief that these “enemies” may willingly work with the SEC and or other authorities at this point to take Rufus out. Should these things occur, they will NOT ADD ANY VALUE TO FOR SHAREHOLDERS.


Question: What's the deal with Mensah, is AISS still your flagship JV? Does he really not know what he is talking about?

Rufus: Mensah, why don’t you ask him?


Interpretation: Once again, we can put an end to all the speculation regarding AISS and Dr. Mensah. The relationship with Mensah and AISS is likely over. I believe that was clear from Mensah’s original (and illegally recorded) appearance on Paltalk and when both Ben and Harris belittled the multi-patent holder as one who does not know what he is talking about and one that does not understand business. Clearly, Mensah understood enough to know that the funding promised “will never be delivered”. I also sense that Rufus might use the above tactics to try and keep using the AISS name as JV partner.


Question: Did you not state already that the Merger was done/complete? if so, can you explain what is going on here really? What’s this merger completion date all about?

Rufus: Merger was complete and voted for by the majority, just had to get all of the paperwork done.


Interpretation: Rufus states “The Merger was complete”, but the PR states “the Official Merger date has been set for Wednesday, September 13, 2006”. This ceo may suffer from a form of schitzo I am afraid. Bottom line, Rufus lied to shareholders by repeatedly stating in interviews that the merger was complete, giving deadlines and dates on such things as the price reset dates and the 10k. These statements were intentionally misleading and were for the purpose of effecting the price such that he would be able to quickly dump shares and fund this new project of this. This is a serious matter as it could have caused many to have purchased this stock based on misleading statements by the CEO.


Question: Has the SEC been performing an informal inquiry or investigation of CSHD?

Rufus: I hope so, I will take it to the max with that one, I would bet they are looking at almost every trade. Heck we are, HEHEHEHE


Interpretation: There is an informal investigation, which will likely progress to a formal investigation now that so many bridges have been formed. Once the SEC hears from these various sources that they believe they have been misled and deceived, Rufus Paul Harris will likely be charged with fraud. Sure, he may every now and then try to divert the focus on this SERIOUS matter by crying, as all infamous scams do, that he is being shorted by bad people, such as AMTD via an overseas account, but as we with any semblance of intelligence know, that is a sure sign that this puppy is on it’s last leg.


These are just my interpretations and opinion.