News Focus
News Focus
icon url

LarryAshy

05/17/17 11:19 AM

#3225 RE: Wyn0t #3224

Please explain why it is a conflict of interest according to BK Law. I'm sure we can get the Judge thrown in jail for his failure to abide by the Law that he is sworn to uphold for allowing this travesty!

smh

Having an EC does not guarantee a positive outcome for shareholders...never has been a standard, never will be a standard.

We won't know the difference until the POR is made official.

P.S.- have you noticed anything funny about some oil BKs filed since this one because of the tactics used here? How many BKs do you know of that publicly state the inclusion of equity BEFORE they file?

Albeit a miniscule amount, that is something new. Interesting how things can change like that....huh?
icon url

cents2ks

05/17/17 11:56 AM

#3226 RE: Wyn0t #3224

Well first off, the debtor's main atty isn't paying anyone...they are being paid upwards of a million a month, by us mind you, to try and cancel us. That technicality aside, one word;

Talbot.
icon url

Olde English 800

05/18/17 4:43 AM

#3246 RE: Wyn0t #3224

In any BK case where the judge approves an
ec, the debtor is always required to pay the attorney bills for the EC. Its the law.