Also, Ken Teknus is not the Boogey Man here with BLDV. He is actually the one that jump-started the recovery here for BLDV to get BLDV current. Without him, BLDV would have withered away.
As it should have done. The SEC should have suspended it in connection with the TJM mess years ago.
What you don't seem to understand is that Teknus isn't a lawyer. Far as I can tell, the company doesn't even have a lawyer, except for the woman who wrote that OTCMarkets opinion, which doesn't really mean she advises management on anything.
How and why did Teknus broker a change in control? Not one, really, but two? What gave him standing to do that? Is he a major shareholder? If so, that should be disclosed. Why did he try to conceal the company's history in Nevada? And if it wasn't deliberate, it was incompetent.
Also, I am very familiar with what happened over at FRTD as I was a shareholder over there too and I know for a fact that Ken had nothing to do with the demise of FRTD turning out to be negative. He left way before such had transpired of which I explained in the posts/links above.
And yet he still thought Tom Parilla would be a great choice as CEO of BLDV? Why?
You may not think any of this is important, just as you evidently don't believe the company's years as a shell are important, but the regulators take a different view, and that could come back to bite shareholders in the future.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
