Fear of r/s are superstition. A r/s is not bad when things are turning around. If they have really good news, I don't think they will have it and I think most talk of r/s are shorts keeping people from investing, because of the notions.
If a company is declining, and doing a r/s not to fall off of an exchange, it often is just the beginning of that oompany's decline, and the r/s is often confused with other much bigger issues.
But a r/s doesn't affect your ability to get rich for a company on the rise, and the ONLY way you or any of us will get rich here is if NWBO is on the rise going forward, meaning we're getting good news on its trials.
All that a r/s does is change the way that the fractional ownership is described. It doesn't change your fractional ownership of the venture. And the venture is either worth x billions or not. The numbre of shares doesn't determine the value, the potential revenues determine the value.
So
If you have 100 shares out of a thousand, that is 10%. If the company is worth 10 billion, 10% is 1 billion. These numbers are just to make the comparisons easy, not predictions of valuation.
And if the company did a 10 for 1 share split so that now you only own 10 shares out of 100. The value of the company is still 1 billion, and you won 10% of that... The number of shares doesn't determine the valuation of a company. It's pure innumeracy that drives these conversations and shorts know it and love to push those buttons.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
