InvestorsHub Logo

GREGG THE GREEK

05/03/17 9:10 AM

#55536 RE: stervc #55532

The volume.





I think the market has already resolved that issue by looking at the volume that has transpired to absorb the vast majority of the Float over the past few days




Speaks volumes.



BLDV

mymonies

05/03/17 9:11 AM

#55537 RE: stervc #55532

MODS STICKY PLEASE

Stockcaller

05/03/17 9:12 AM

#55538 RE: stervc #55532

Stervc, lovely rebuttal, hit em with FACTS, I love it. Maybe she should allow that to marinate for a while. I too thought the float is fine as it as, as well as the OS.

Here we rise to the top of the mountains after dwelling below the depths of the valleys for far too long. Embrace it as it ascends
to the top!!

$BLDV, the making of a super giant!!

Newbie or not newbie

05/03/17 9:12 AM

#55539 RE: stervc #55532

DAYUMMMMM!! lol

Papalaka

05/03/17 9:20 AM

#55550 RE: stervc #55532

Mods - please sticky Sterling's post.

mrcalifornia

05/03/17 9:23 AM

#55553 RE: stervc #55532

Now that is a rebuttal ! Stervc for the buzzer beater swishhhhhhh! ;)

janice shell

05/03/17 4:54 PM

#55928 RE: stervc #55532

1 ** You are insinuating as if the TJ Management transaction was a bad thing... it's not... it's actually a good thing.

2 ** You are insinuating that FINRA denying BLDV from a reverse split was a bad thing... it's not... it's actually a good thing.


I am not "insinuating" either. I am stating it as fact. The TJM episode was a disaster, and it seems no attempt has been made to fix it.

The TJ Management transaction with the previous BLDV management allowed for a huge part of the Float to be officially locked up to not be traded.

Had the predecessor company not become involved with TJM, the float would be smaller, and none of it would be "locked up". And FINRA would presumably have no problem allowing the company to effect corporate actions.

Do you really think that they knew of that transaction or was even part of it to where they couldn’t prove such to FINRA?

No. At least I suspect Alper didn't know about it when he became involved with the BLDV shell. And that is inexcusable. You don't take on a shell without making sure you know EVERY skeleton in its closet.

If you are simply trying to say that BLDV was tainted because of the TJ Management deal that was done a few managements ago back in 2010, then I get that. BLDV was tainted because of that transaction back in 2010, but it’s not tainted now because of what BLDV have done and are doing now.

And what has BLDV done to deal with it? Nothing I can see.

Not being approved by FINRA for a reverse split is really another blessing in disguise for us shareholders because it provided the needed time for management to realize that a reverse split is not needed to provide the liquidity that would not have existed otherwise.

Once again, this company does not need a 2.4 billion share float. NO penny stock does. As for liquidity, it would not have been a problem. The split planned was only a 1:10. There'd have been plenty of shares outstanding, and they'd have traded at a higher price.

Going forward, BLVD will need to issue more stock. Acquisitions and the completion of projects is not free. And so the o/s will become larger and larger.

This is kind of like a share buyback without having to spend money to have shares taken away from being in circulation within the true Float.

It is NOTHING like a stock repurchase program.