"We could hold the individuals themselves responsible for their own statements perhaps."
They would need to be identified, obviously. Both of the venues we know about won't do that. When they provide you and I that same protection I doubt that we will complain that it's a bad idea.
I know that's a little obtuse....besides, we would never do anything that triggered the need to be protected, right?
For SA, for example, to make the decision to ID a member they would have to be willing to do so any time they received such a subpoena. All or none are the only choices. The choice has been none. I think it's the right one.
I'm hoping you can fix this but you need to pick up the pace a little :o)
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
