InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

InTheTrenches

02/16/17 6:57 PM

#852 RE: SF Wolf #851

Not just Dr. Alkon, but other independent, peer-reviewed studies show the false narrative of the amyloid plaque theory:

A study by professor Clive Homes published in the Lancet supports the criticism of the amyloid hypothesis. Homes found, during autopsies of dementia patients who'd undergone treatment for the removal of amyloid plaque, that while some had virtually complete plaque removal, seven of the eight still died with severe end-stage dementia. "In the whole cohort," Homes wrote, "there was no evidence of improved survival or of an improvement in the time to severe dementia" versus the placebo group.

icon url

F1ash

02/16/17 7:03 PM

#854 RE: SF Wolf #851

-----
My question is does AVXL fall into the treating amyloid deposits hypothesis camp or not?
---------
No. Anavex is targeting the Sigma 1 receptor in hopes of restoring cellular homeostasis. Not targeting plaques.
icon url

drbio45

02/16/17 7:18 PM

#855 RE: SF Wolf #851

There is nothing wrong with targeting plaques and tau, if you doing other things also

the problem with the BACE inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies target plaque is that is ALL they do.

Bryostatin activates the enzymes ECE, IDE and neprilysin, which inhibit plaque and inhibits GSK3 beta which inhibits tau formation, but in addition to that increases growth factors to restore synapses.

Multi modal mechanism, not one target
icon url

XenaLives

02/16/17 8:14 PM

#858 RE: SF Wolf #851

No, 2-73 is not a plaque attack drug.... different MOA from NTRP - possibly synergistic.