News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Slojab

02/15/17 1:32 PM

#13888 RE: SirBrian #13887

Compare it to the initial resolution wording from 2014.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=104369772

icon url

Cycleman

02/15/17 4:16 PM

#13889 RE: SirBrian #13887

The agreements are identical save for the name of the "Developer" which is now AGP instead of SWET. The original agreement was entered into in April of 2014 and was effective for a period of three years. It renewed only if SWET started construction which it has not. Accordingly, it was nearing its expiration date. This is not a new "development" demonstrating advancement of SWET's proposal to build the tower. To maintain any premise that this thing is still alive, SWET needed to either renew (and assign to AGP) the existing agreement or enter into a new agreement with AGP as a party rather than SWET.
icon url

Homebrew

02/15/17 5:15 PM

#13890 RE: SirBrian #13887

Picket can print any crap he wants. His "tower" defies the laws of physics, so until he can get those laws changed, it won't go forward.