Let's take stock this morning of the current and future value of your TAUG investment.
TAUG has no cash (less than $300). TAUG has no offices. Why it it that TAUG posts on their SEC filings that they have an office in Danbury, CT when they don't. TAUG has no office phone number. The office phone that TAUG uses in their filings is actually the cell phone number of the TAUG CEO.
TAUG has no employees. TAUG has no management team. In fact TAUG has more major lawsuits than they do people to defend and prosecute them. The only paid person at TAUG, who earns cash, is the CFO who lives and works at home in Montreal, Canada, not Danbury, CT, not NYC, not even in the U.S. Yet, TAUG finds it more important to have hired five paid message board posters who attack DECN and its CEO 18 hours a day. These paid posters also attack certain DECN shareholders. With all of the work TAUG needs to get done to join the standard business world, why are resources being devoted to attack another company who has nothing to do with TAUG? Is this how a real company operates. The answer to that is yes and no. Yes if TAUG is being run by stock traders and a bottom feeding stock hyper. No, if you invested because TAUG had good business opportunities and products. Ultimately you have to ask yourself, on who's watch did all of this occur?
Which leads to the most important part of TAUG's business. TAUG has no business. They have a lawsuit that has already cost 600 million toxic shares and has provided nothing. And now they have earned a fresh lawsuit as a result of their attacks on another company. The consultant made this decision on behalf of shareholders. Let's see a show of hands from shareholders. Which group of shareholders authorized the BOD to turn the company over to the consultant, a person who has spent time in jail for threatening children and judges. Who authorized the CEO and the consultant to hire board posters to attack another company and its CEO? Which shareholders authorized a lawsuit with that company resulting from Internet stalking and libeling of the other company, its CEO and its BOD?
Oh but I digress. TAUG has no products. They have nothing to sell. Yet, TAUG has a conflicted consultant who calls the shots at the company from on-top while receiving sweetheart deals in the form of highly discounted toxic convertibles. This is called self-dealing and is a form of securities fraud. Securities fraud on behalf of the consultant and the CEO who signed off on the sweetheart deals.
TAUG has no management team. TAUG has no business or reverse merger partners. To the public it appears that TAUG is mismanaged by its CEO, a consultant, and a rubber stamp BOD for personal gains.
This is bad... bad... bad.... And it raises questions. Why is TAUG through its CEO and consultant involved in all of these diversions? And what makes them think that these diversions are helping maximize shareholder value? Is it good for TAUG that another company is suing TAUG for these diversions? Of course it's not. So why is TAUG, its BOD, CEO and consultant doing this? It must be money. It must be self-dealing.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
