Replies to post #14 on Secrecy in Site Administration

[greg s]

Added to iBox:

UPDATE: It appears to be a fait accompli:

Posted by: IH Admin [Matt]
In reply to: Koikaze who wrote msg# 71472 Date:8/20/2006 6:05:02 PM
Post #of 71492

KOI:

It's the same folks that always complain.

The good part is, the iHub faithful seem to like the idea, so I am going to do it.

They will be anonymous as you suggest. I will be the one dealing with complaints. Everything will appear as if I was the one who removed spam/etc.

There really shouldn't be any complaints about them, though. The more complicated stuff, me/dave will continue to deal with.

MB

Matt corrected the above post after it was pointed out that Koikaze recommended the Patron Posse should not be anonymous:

Posted by: IH Admin [Matt]
In reply to: Koikaze who wrote msg# 71472 Date:8/20/2006 6:05:02 PM
Post #of 71492

KOI:

It's the same folks that always complain.

The good part is, the iHub faithful seem to like the idea, so I am going to do it.

They will be anonymous, at least for now. I will be the one dealing with complaints. Everything will appear as if I was the one who removed spam/etc.

There really shouldn't be any complaints about them, though. The more complicated stuff, me/dave will continue to deal with.

MB

#msg-12790548