News Focus
News Focus
icon url

lineItemVeto

12/04/16 2:40 PM

#115644 RE: samsamsamiam #115643

Sorry about the stock promo error, 2015 not 2016
icon url

Monksdream

12/04/16 5:12 PM

#115652 RE: samsamsamiam #115643

I read the latest SPCL 8k. I found this interesting.


The Company is currently delinquent in its filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and, to date, has been unable to file unaudited financial statements of the Company or its Pixel subsidiary in 2016. The Company’s management in working with outside auditors to audit the financial statements of Pixel for 2014 and 2015 and intends to file Form 10-Q Quarterly Reports for the Company and its Pixel subsidiary as soon as is practicable.

The Company also notes that there have been recent publications and other postings on the Internet by third parties alleging that Pixel has significant revenues, with figures as much as over $70 million mentioned. Such publication also speculates that the value of Solaris’ common stock could be significantly greater than its current trading price.

None of these postings or publications have been authorized or approved by the Company, any member of its current or prior management or any representative of the Company. In fact, the speculated revenues of Pixel are materially misleading and are significantly in excess of current levels of sales revenues. Investors are urged to ignore any such reports, publications or postings and should rely only upon public reports filed by the Company with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

What I'm thinking is the company was engaged in digital distribution of some famous magazines and the business has just about gone kaput. But why would it attempt to merge itself into a company that makes yet another solar cell as if there aren't already enough companies making solar cells listed on the New York Stock Exchange?