I would think if NWBO has come this far with their current communication strategy of meeting the minimum legal requirements for a public company, that they will not alter that strategy until they are free from the sensitive regulatory phase they are now in. I do not agree with it from a shareholder perspective but I think that I am being logical in concluding they will not change their communication strategy given where they are right now, until post P3. Then, I expect to see a return to normal interaction.
This company is the most fascinating and frustrating dichotomy of:
- having virtually no market respect for their shares, which reflects on their science and their management
and
- their accomplishments of working with some of the most renown global cancer institutions in the U.S. and the EU
- developing a product that is potentially at the pinnacle of the largest pharma industry challenge and market
- if you do the math the current P3 trial looks like a success
I believe the lack of market respect is due to the checkered and littered history of immuno-oncology and of DC therapy in particular. When technology which is not brand new advances to a breakthrough point it can take significant steps to prove it has truly advanced and this is not just another false alarm. Who would think such a breakthrough would be achieved by NWBO when there are such others in the field with so much more history and resources to place confidence in. If the AF stuff had not occurred they may be in a different place, but, that is what the AF illegal stuff is all about. It has not changed the timeline, just the obstacles to get there. Patients have the most to gain here and the shareholders who have invested with the deepest knowledge possible. Thanks again to real contributors on this board.
Both fascinating and frustrating for a shareholder. GLTA