In theory you're right but in practice we will reach the point of diminishing returns especially since a reverse split and other adverse outcomes for shareholders becomes more likely the longer there is a delay.
But the theory that the longer the wait, the better rests on conventional wisdom and conventional wisdom may not apply to a trial that has gone through so many overhauls, including I might remind you, a screening halt that never ended!
Besides, if more delays are so great, how come the closest thing to an official explanation to that effect comes from a heavily disputed video from Dr. Linda Liau that was pulled down?
Is it not reasonable for NWBO at say it's looming shareholder's meeting to explain what the failure of the trial to conclude means for shareholders?