And yet you posted what you hoped to see in the letter from the CEO and not inlybwere those things not included,THERE WASNT EVEN A LETTER!
The claim that there are limits to one's loyalty to the company have been clearly shown to be false.
We've been having the Tox completion debate for 5 years. I've asked againa and again, at what point will there be acceptance that maybe, just maybe, this arrangement was done for financial reasons and not drug development? I asked in 2012, "why if there's no Tox by '17?" And that seemed like an extreme and ridiculous notion. And yet, here we are.
It must be getting clearer...maybe not. People only see what is in their best interest.