Replies to post #126942 on NanoViricides Inc (NNVC)

[drkazmd65]

And yet you posted what you hoped to see in the letter from the CEO and not inlybwere those things not included,THERE WASNT EVEN A LETTER!

True on both points,... but what is the point of this statement?

The claim that there are limits to one's loyalty to the company have been clearly shown to be false.

Also incorrect,... I can (as usual) only speak for myself, but I do have limits,... I have (in fact) figured out contingency plays for either very good, or particularly bad outcomes,... The fact that I haven't shared specifics of these widely should never be construed as not having developed such guidelines already.

A good investor/speculator always has these sorts of ideas fleshed out ahead of time.
:-)

We've been having the Tox completion debate for 5 years.

I haven't been having this debate for that long,.. although I have been expecting it since the Shelton plant did (finally) get online. The fact we haven't seen it 'yet' is a point of annoyance to me.

I've asked againa (sic) and again, at what point will there be acceptance that maybe, just maybe, this arrangement was done for financial reasons and not drug development?

I've listened to that point 'again and again',... And have found the arguments made to be lacking IMO.

Again - have a great remainder of your Sunday.