News Focus
News Focus
icon url

zatafour

11/04/16 9:20 AM

#113069 RE: Gold49er #113064

Excellent post 49er... Thank you...
icon url

TheSummerMan

11/04/16 9:36 AM

#113075 RE: Gold49er #113064

LOL. Armchair lawyer got it wrong.

Excellent post, 49er.
icon url

absintheminded90210

11/04/16 9:43 AM

#113077 RE: Gold49er #113064

The hearing you're so wrapped up in was in 11/2014. The spring of 2015 was when MS/PF got caught hiding shit from discovery, it was scheduled for jury trial in 01/2017 just before settlement.

Don't see how you can draw the conclusions about the hearing that you are.
icon url

Koog

11/04/16 9:58 AM

#113088 RE: Gold49er #113064

A Markman hearing is a pre-trial hearing, not a trial. A jury has never judged the efficacy of this firm's patent claim.
icon url

NioStar

11/04/16 10:24 AM

#113103 RE: Gold49er #113064

3 Defendants , 2 of which did not proceed.

Phone Factor, Proceeded
FiServe , Dropped
First Midwest Bancorp , Dropped

Is this the MO for SFOR's Lawyers.
File 3 and hope 1 sticks ?

Did they get lucky getting one to stick ?
Hey, one out of 3 ain't bad, I guess


My point, 3 new cases are not a slam dunk.
Don't bet the bank !
Perhaps none squeak through this time.
Qualifying Filters not at 100%.
66% Failure rate on last round
icon url

newlonginvest

11/04/16 1:53 PM

#113210 RE: Gold49er #113064

Mod .. please sticky this !
icon url

newlonginvest

11/04/16 2:06 PM

#113214 RE: Gold49er #113064

Mod .. please sticky this .. repeating
icon url

Joe89

11/04/16 2:47 PM

#113221 RE: Gold49er #113064

Thanks for clarifying, that was useful info.
icon url

newlonginvest

11/05/16 11:48 AM

#113632 RE: Gold49er #113064

Mods .. pls sticky this .. repeating again
icon url

newlonginvest

11/05/16 6:09 PM

#113732 RE: Gold49er #113064

Nods pls sticky this .. repeating
icon url

NioStar

11/05/16 9:59 PM

#113772 RE: Gold49er #113064

33% Success Rate / 66% Fail Rate Legal Counsel

THIS HIGHLIGHT'S HOW SFOR'S ATTOURNEY OPERATES

They process Legal Suits in batches of 3 hoping 1 will stick.

1)PhoneFactor ( Win )
2)Fiserve ( dismissed )
3)First Midwest Boncorp ( disissed )

It Also highlights their success rate @ 33.33 Percent and a Failure Rate of 66.66 %

These are Real numbers folks!
DO NOT THINK FOR A MOMENT SFOR HAS A CHANCE TO WIN ALL THREE NEW CASES OR THEY WILL BE BRINGING HOME 90 MILLION IN TREBLE DAMAGES.

THEY MIGHT WIN ONE @ 10 MILLION, IF THEY ARE LUCKY !

SFOR DROPS TO .004 NOV 10 SETLEMENTS EXTENDED
SFOR DROPS TO .003 NOV 15 LACKLUSTER SALES
SFOR DROPS TO .002 NOV 21 NO CONTRACT NEWS AGM

THE BIG NEWS AT THE AGM WILL BE PAY INCREASES AND CHEAP WINE













icon url

jfkspire

11/05/16 11:43 PM

#113788 RE: Gold49er #113064

The evidence considered in a Markman hearing falls into two categories: intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic evidence consists of the patent documentation and any prosecution history of the patent. Extrinsic evidence is testimony, expert opinion, or other unwritten sources; extrinsic evidence may not contradict intrinsic evidence.[5]
[/quote
Marksman Hearing

The statement in red above only goes to show that "most likely" (IMO) in Future Patent Infringement cases the same evidence does not need to be presented again, making the our current 3 Lawsuits that much simpler to be heard and the cases maybe be Settled in much less time.

icon url

jfkspire

11/06/16 12:17 AM

#113792 RE: Gold49er #113064

Expect a chain reaction of Settlements from GOOGLE,,,IBM,,,SYMANTEC,,,...etc...
As soon as the Current 3Defendants Settle, the price will rocket non-stop!!

The evidence considered in a Markman hearing falls into two categories: intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic evidence consists of the patent documentation and any prosecution history of the patent. Extrinsic evidence is testimony, expert opinion, or other unwritten sources; extrinsic evidence may not contradict intrinsic evidence.[5]
[/quote
Marksman Hearing

The statement in red above only goes to show that "most likely" (IMO) in Future Patent Infringement cases the same evidence does not need to be presented again, making the our current 3 Lawsuits that much simpler to be heard and the cases maybe be Settled in much less time.


That is exactly why many have said that once these 3 Settle,,the next future defendants will be at a disadvantage.
A chain reaction of settlements from Giant Companys like IBM,,,GOOGLE,,,....etc... will be inevitable.
Then $$SFOR$$ will trade above Single Dollars and people will not believe it!!.
The patents are currently valued at worth $8Billion Dollars. If SFOR were to win just a Quarter of that 8 Billion Value in just muliple Settlements. ..ie..If Say $SFOR$ walks away with $2Billion in all Chain reaction settlements.
That would almost be equal to the O/S of the Current Shares that SFOR has, and that Should easily rise the Price to 1Dollar!!







icon url

newlonginvest

11/06/16 12:22 AM

#113794 RE: Gold49er #113064

Mods.. please sticky this Gold49er message .. repeating !!
icon url

jfkspire

11/06/16 12:39 AM

#113796 RE: Gold49er #113064

Markman hearings are important, since the court determines patent infringement cases by the interpretation of claims. A Markman hearing may encourage settlement, since the judge's claim construction finding can indicate a likely outcome for the patent infringement case as a whole.


$$SFOR$$

















icon url

RDY2ROCK

11/06/16 1:21 AM

#113798 RE: Gold49er #113064

Very well said and AWESOME post! ;-)
icon url

newlonginvest

11/06/16 11:37 AM

#113877 RE: Gold49er #113064

Thanks Mods for sticky this
icon url

adonaiwindows

11/06/16 2:58 PM

#113908 RE: Gold49er #113064

Post of the year Gold...
Great job getting it stickied longs..
Don't think that's a word, but I'm sure the shorts get it...
Game on ...
SFOR
icon url

carusso

11/06/16 5:24 PM

#113943 RE: Gold49er #113064

THANK YOU Gold49er.
icon url

Eng62

11/06/16 8:11 PM

#113970 RE: Gold49er #113064

Thanks
icon url

SmallBuy

11/10/16 12:51 AM

#115150 RE: Gold49er #113064

This is a wonderful post.

Why would anyone claim the efficacy has never been tested...

If the case was settled "with prejudice".

Its quite a silly thing to say in the first place.

Now thats not saying we know it was in our favor.

But he had made up his mind already.