Sorry Doc Logic but I cannot agree with anything in your post. Have you read my post properly?
I do not trade in or out....I'm not a day trader. Your answer to the CEO communicating better with shareholders is to advise shareholders to have a personal plan for risk tolerance. You do realise this is a public company and as such communicating with shareholders is part of what she gets paid to do. I don't think mine or your personal circumstances come into it. Shareholders have a right to ask questions regarding strategy and performance. I read on here an awful lot about PR's being attacked by shorts as a defence for staying silent. You do realise that the stock has been in free fall since the company decided to stay silent. Naked shorting is not going to be stopped by communicating PR's or staying silent. This extended silence imho is an expensive mission creep exercise born out of advice from lawyers that say the only way to catch them is to avoid PR's that provide a "smokescreen" to hide irregular share trades. The problem with that is virtually all shareholders expect management to defend the companies reputation and to be kept properly updated. I say the silence only works for a limited period and originally the management said around three months which was fine. Would management have signed up to a policy of radio silence if they knew it was going to take a year or more?
You are also quite mistaken if you think that the CEO of a public company cannot communicate to shareholders through fear of pumping the stock price. I have never heard anything more ridiculous. She is a professional and as such can perfectly manage the difference between pumping false and untrue updates from informing shareholders as to the progress being made in many areas of the company. She can also go on record as many times as she likes to refute any untrue allegations made by AF...
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
