If you think that I (or any same person) would read this garbage, you're crazy. Every one of your false narratives has been debunked by HD and JL. Maybe this would work for you on SA, but certainly not here.
Pyrr: Here's a challenge for you: perhaps you could use aspirin as a proxy and apply the same thinking you're applying to EPA/Vascepa. I think the results of your parallel analysis could be quite revealing.
Your dietary arguments, along with other aspects of lifestyle and the minimized effects of EPA are clearly not being subjected to a systemic rationale. Reading your thoughts makes me think of an argument akin to 'because the patient was taller than the average, there was no anti-inflammatory effect'.
Here's a starting point for the acetylsalicylic acid/ salicyclic sources that give us our natural and concentrated dosages. And don't forget the side effects comparison!
First off DHA has little effect on negating oxLDL-C, sorry buddy! But back to the drawing board for you! You need to ask for your money back, from that accelerated med class you took. :>)
The Basics CVD 101:
Oxidized LDL-C is the major cause of the disease. The body realizes this is an invader entering the Endothelium. Did you forget that the macrophages attack LDL-C causing buildup in the lining. Which EPA does a great job at neutralizing.
Unfortunately, your credibility has been nullified by the fact that you refuse to acknowledge or comprehend any data that runs contrary to your oft repeated, myopic understanding of EPA's therapeutic value, R-IT's high probability of success, Vascepa's growing market share etc.
If you were to present a balanced viewpoint/opinion that takes ALL known facts into account, it would likely do wonders for your acceptance as a credible poster on this board.
Can you help me understand how you can hold the view that the supplement is too small to affect the outcome and also site DHA as working and therefore better? How is it possible to maintain both positions?
This li'l gem of a post from Pyrr, (wherein he unequivocally states that R-IT will fail), deserves to be revisited.
N.B.: It's odd that he would still feel comfortable, endlessly posting FUD when he has been so thoroughly discredited. Then, again... I guess that's what he gets paid to do.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
