News Focus
News Focus
icon url

petermic

08/04/06 10:48 PM

#30430 RE: OzarkDareDevil #30428

I'm afraid that is true. Say anything.
icon url

gaonmymind

08/04/06 10:49 PM

#30431 RE: OzarkDareDevil #30428

quote: OzarkDareDevil "That's 4 and 1/2 years difference on quotes. What does that tell me? It tells me you are being less than honest. This pump is being operated with the classic "throw enough shit on the wall and some of it may stick." It smells of what it is."

Very true, but if you scroll down further, at least 5 out of the 5 examples were dynamic returns within weeks, and you do have to say that these stocks were nothing of the magnitude of CSHC, honestly, you can remove any example on that list over 1 month and we still have valid proof, right?

Lastly, your counter point really sucks man, examples were asked for, they were given, now the examples aren't good enough, why? Because of time? Okay, I give you that, but its only 1 out of 10, not a good average, I still win!

Until you can get a valid argument on more than 4 out of 10 you still lose, SO MAN UP AND FACE IT! If you can give me arguments to discredit at least 5 then I will man up and tell you let me keep searching no big deal, just a healthy debate, that you are losing at the moment.

icon url

oilstrike

08/04/06 11:07 PM

#30440 RE: OzarkDareDevil #30428

LMAO get a timex
icon url

ced70

08/05/06 4:32 AM

#30490 RE: OzarkDareDevil #30428

Okay so 130 times what you originally had in 4.5 years? Hmmm....yeah I would hate to make that kind of money too.