Okay so lots of patients with 150 - 200 TG counts and one other risk factor were randomized. Got it.
Not exactly. 38% (lots of?) was between 150-202, but we do not know the mean. (The mean of the 8,000 will be definitely above and not below 200 (as you claimed) ... just a reminder about the starting point ...) 70% is CV Risk Category 1 (patients with established CVD defined in the inclusion criteria. Patients with diabetes and established CVD are included in this category.) and 30% is CV Risk Category 2 (patients with diabetes and at least one additional risk factor for CVD, but no established CVD.) Protocol
Wrt baseline EPA levels and ANCHOR or MARINE vs R-IT, do you think control in R-IT will have baseline closer to MAR or ANCH? And why? What would you guess it will be?
Sorry, my fault, I wasn't careful (took together / mixed with the previous paragraph) ... but I am relaxed and not worry. - closer to / similar to ANCHOR - as more or less the same population - +10%/-10-20% vs ANCHOR
Their lipids will remain blinded to them and their primary care doc?
VuBru could give a more educated answer (if he want), however do you think - everybody has a primary care doc? Especially ex-US enrollees. - wealthy, educated, etc are the most common or not? Unless clinical trial is a new hobby / trend among them I do not think. But never mind ... If this is so common, drop-out is high, why the number wasn't increased? Please note: they made a check approximately 3- to 6-months prior to the projected enrollment of the 7990th patient.