Mocha . . .see the response to Tinberry. As I said, I did not intend on offending anyone. I just mentioned exactly how the rules operate in the market without going into specifics. I did not even instigate that HRCT disclosed any material information. I was just saying that "in the event" that material information was disclosed, what they would need to do. You need not fear putting anything on a message board that you heard in a shareholder's meeting. Most of that information should already be available to the rest of the market. There is nothing that you guys are going to learn from these "shareholder meetings" that others don't already know. You will just have a chance to judge the character of the leadership of your investment. And that's good, you can share that.
It would be nice to have had a critical reporter view the event and mention whether they felt that the leadership appeared to be . . ."blah, blah, blah" in an objective fashion.
Lets get back on track here and try to avoid letting emotion take over when perfectly legit statements are made. In my opinion, you guys should do a lot more listening to some of the folks you blame for tattle-telling and "bashing" so to speak. I do not see "bashing" from some of the negative comments nor do I see an "agenda" for those who are speaking up. I do, however, see warning signs on both sides of this equation that are all over the place.
Many of you could benefit from listening to others that have spent some time to understand how this market works (and those who know how it works). Stocks have no emotions whatsoever, but people sure do build a lot of emotion for their stocks. Interesting.
Peace,
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
