Replies to post #110960 on DD Support Board and Research Team

[badbadbad]

SETH SHAW = SPONGETECH

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=62870140


NEW Moskowitz E-MAIL: 'DO IT QUIETLY'

FBI likes to be NON TRANSPARENT.

Who is George Speranza's new 'WHO'?

"...Specifically, Speranza lied about when
he initially discussed creating the websites
for Spongetech, and WHO at
Spongetech asked him to establish the websites
and virtual offices..."
http://www.fbi.gov/newyork/press-releases/2011/marketing-company-executive-pleads-guilty-to-perjury-in-connection-with-investigation-of-spongetech-delivery-systems-inc

I asked George Speranza by e-mail be he didn't reply yet.

In his first testimony, the 'WHO' was Richard Heller.

Now, with FBI 'superb' NON transparent work, it can be anyone working or not working at SpongeTech. It can be me!

So, Who is the new 'WHO'?

- Frank Nicolois?
- Thomas Cavanagh?
- Jimmy Einsenberg?
- Avi Tepfer?
- Steven Moskowitz?
- Michael Metter?
- Me, David Pilon?
- Kaja Whitehouse
- Bruce Springstein?
- Donald Trump?
- Patrick Kelly of Harbor Enterprises?
- Frank Lazauskas?
- Myron Weiner?
- Peter Klein?
- Barry Kolevzon?
- Jack Schwartzberg?
- Bill Young?
- Avi Mirman
- Marcus Butler?
- Michael Harstein?
- Barry Honig?
- Carl Freer?
- Seth Shaw?
- Other?

David PATCH (patchman) says SETH SHAW may be the new 'WHO'

On his investigation web site, he said that Seth Shaw could very well be the one because he was deeply studied in the RISK and ATTACKS document he published. RISK ASSESSMENT document published by David PATCH:

http://www.investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/?q=node/908

http://www.investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/files/Risk_Assessment-Spongetech_1_of_2.pdf

http://www.investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/files/Risk_Assessment-Spongetech_2_of_2.pdf

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Steven Moskowitz <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: Seth Shaw
To: [e-mail]

Nether he works when we need him he is close freind of mine
and we don't need IR right now when we do he will be back


-------------------------------
From: David Pilon <[e-mail]>
To: Steven Moskowitz
Sent: Sun May 16 07:52:30 2010
Subject: Re: Seth Shaw

Why is Seth Shaw not employed by SpongeTech anymore? He threw
first pitch at Coors field last year so he must have been
important to SpongeTech! Is it because of current cash flow
problems, or because of "internal threat" problems, or other?


-------------------------------
From: Steven Moskowitz <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:48 AM
Subject: Re: Seth Shaw
To: [e-mail]

Correct


-------------------------------
From: David Pilon <[e-mail]>
To: Steven Moskowitz
Sent: Sun May 16 07:47:49 2010
Subject: Re: Seth Shaw

OK. So, this "Risk Assessment" document was not requested by
SpongeTech, and was not produced on a request from SpongeTech,
correct?


-------------------------------
From: Steven Moskowitz <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:43 AM
Subject: Re: Seth Shaw
To: [e-mail]

No he is not but I know he is not a threat who ever put it
together tried to harm us


-------------------------------
From: David Pilon <[e-mail]>
To: Steven Moskowitz
Sent: Sun May 16 07:41:30 2010
Subject: Re: Seth Shaw

Can you open links on your BlackBerry? -> http://www.investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/files/Risk_Assessment-Spongetech_1_of_2.pdf

On page 9, it says Seth Shaw (and two others) should be included
on SpongeTech's list of potential threats.

Is Seth Shaw still employed by SpongeTech?


-------------------------------
From: Steven Moskowitz <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: Seth Shaw
To: [e-mail]

Why


-------------------------------
From: David Pilon <[e-mail]>
To: Steven Moskowitz
Sent: Sun May 16 07:36:29 2010
Subject: Seth Shaw

Hi Mr. Moskowitz, is Seth Shaw still employed by SpongeTech?



Who is the new 'WHO'?

Is it Seth Shaw?

Consider the following statement by David Patch, made after we were discussing the Risk Assessment, and I [cowtown jay] questioned how it came to be in his possession. Well, badshah asked David about that the next day. Patch replied:

"The documents were delivered to me and others by an individual within Spongetech's INNER CIRCLE."

OK? So David Patch was inside SpongeTech's inner circle? Why?

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: [e-mail]
To: David Pilon <[e-mail]>
Sent: Fri, May 6, 2011 5:37:47 PM
Subject: Re: The Shell

No do it quietly please respect that

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry


-----------------
From: David Pilon <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 13:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
To: <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: The Shell

Did you throw the towel resurrecting our number one brand in
sports company you founded? No pride? You lost interest?
Shareholders and former employees and reputation you don't care
anymore?


-----------------
From: David Pilon <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Sent: Fri, May 6, 2011 12:47:21 PM
Subject: The Shell

Mr. Moskowitz, what can be done to have Silverman sell the
SpongeTech public shell? Prove he refused offers while the
company was still in Chapt.11?

[rbtree]

rbtree Tuesday, 07/26/16 12:08:35 PM
Re: brightguy post# 166920
Post #
166933
of 166933 Go
And I never shorted any stock or get paid to bash SCAMS

Hmmm, you're missing out. Just think, you could be getting rich. You need to become a card carrying member of the Shell Minion Premium Bashers (SMPG---hell we may be headed for the NASDAQ)