News Focus
News Focus
icon url

VVVVVV

07/15/16 7:08 PM

#35205 RE: GreenBackClub #35172

Great points! I always respect your posts. One of the few I read. Keep up the good work.
icon url

invergaard

07/15/16 7:14 PM

#35208 RE: GreenBackClub #35172

"Example....The UNIFIED PATENTS IPR claim has 14 claims. Maybe half of them get knocked out? That leaves 7 claims left to enforce and monetize IN ADDITION TO the remaining claims in VPLM's infringement lawsuits. That could result in a pretty penny for shareholders..... "

COULD also result in being left with a bad of goodies that aren't enforceable and labeled as obvious by said committee and court.

Let's just say your example above pans out. Now VPLM must prove that these standalone claims are being infringed upon. Now VPLM must file new lawsuits, more time, more $90K/month burn rates, more dilution, and a timeline that grows immensely as far as receiving possible fruits of their labor.

icon url

ButtersOnARoll

07/15/16 7:30 PM

#35211 RE: GreenBackClub #35172

Don't you think at some point the PTAB will think of UP has the boy who cried wolf? I sure as hell would!!