Replies to post #35208 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[CEOs]

Also, if some very critical claims are removed, the potential value could drop significantly.

So,

No crowdfunding raised
A pps below 5 cents (as predicted)
A potentially major error in serving Apple
Lack of disclosure even though they are fully reporting

And an IPR which could invalidate a key claim in RBR.

Yep.

[GreenBackClub]

COULD also result in being left with a bad of goodies that aren't enforceable and labeled as obvious by said committee and court.

Let's just say your example above pans out. Now VPLM must prove that these standalone claims are being infringed upon. Now VPLM must file new lawsuits, more time, more $90K/month burn rates, more dilution, and a timeline that grows immensely as far as receiving possible fruits of their labor.

Yes, anything is possible and we could all be left holding a bag in our hands.

VPLM will not have to file new infringement suits as two are still in force as of today (Stay has not officially been granted yet).

Although you paint what seems like an insurmountable mountain to climb for VPLM (and indeed there might be truth to this), after reading through the patent prosecution history and watching this chess game play out I feel that there is a strong likelihood of VPLM succeeding on the merits.