It was in reference to the numbers they brought to court to argue insolvency before the judge. Im assuming the sec filings were accurate (i could be wrong). The judge was skeptical of those numbers and when questioned, the opposition ended up admitting indirectly that there were more assets that had not been brought forth to the table(my interpretation). Take what I say with a grain of salt since I did not actually attend and therefore I can't say with certainty that what I said was completely true. I'm simply forwarding hearsay from someone who actually was there.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
