News Focus
News Focus
icon url

JSee

07/09/16 8:58 PM

#73593 RE: JSee #73592

And the Santos argument doesn't even apply to VTCQ investors anymore because Paul KICKED THEM TO THE CURB. That'll shut them up.
icon url

TheWords

07/09/16 8:59 PM

#73594 RE: JSee #73592

Bogus!

I don't see any contract or consideration being paid. How is a "memo" a credible transfer of a public company assets? If those lines around the signature box is indeed a cut and paste, isn't Santos guilty of attempted grand larceny? If he was true owner why doesn't Santos make Europe work with him?

Don't see any chance of even one of your buddies predictions coming right, infact they have already been disproved but he keeps going on his mission.
icon url

JSee

07/09/16 9:00 PM

#73595 RE: JSee #73592

icon url

lesgetrich

07/10/16 12:50 PM

#73615 RE: JSee #73592

You realize the only solid evidence on either side of the argument is a publicly published document with Paul's signature on it.



The other piece of factual evidence is that mCig denies that it's authentic. So at best your objective evidence is questionable. It's also of dubious legal value since it's not notarized or printed on company letterhead and Al's is the only signature on the assignment letter as VTCQ CEO assigning the rights to himself.

In any event, the whole thing is irrelevant since mCig doesn't need the trademark and Al doesn't own it and probably never will.