Replies to post #110200 on DD Support Board and Research Team

[janice shell]

IMO remaining annonymous in such an important case protecting the public is hte same as a defendant excercising their rights to take the 5th.

That may be the most preposterous thing you've said today. Have you considered gaining a deeper understanding of our constitution?

[236T568]

Are you serious?

So a cybersleuth that exposes a massive fraud is as guilty as the scamsters because he decides to keep his real identity private?

geesh....

Absolutely agree ... Never could figure out why whistleblowers choose to remain annonymous. Exposing such a scam like Treaty with it's gang of con men gangsters deserves a reward and public thank you.

IMO remaining annonymous in such an important case protecting the public is hte same as a defendant excercising their rights to take the 5th.

It is said those that excercise that right are hiding something and probalby guilty. IMO same with annonymous whistleblowers.

What are they hiding from ???