"I agree your unbiased contention was that an officer like the CEO could issue shares and/or take on debt for any reason, because he could. So issue shares, even to himself, no problem. And then you figured out that the CEO can't."
That's right. I made a mistake about the law and acknowledged, apologized for and corrected it. That's what people with integrity do....thanks for noticing.
As far as this goes...
"The contention that board meetings may have been held illegally without proper notice to Mr. Berman was not mine."
I simply wanted the TAUG director to know that my response was based on a statement made by someone else...you, who were either purportedly advised or made aware of that contention by Berman himself or fabricated it...there was no public statement by Berman to that effect. Given the quote Mr. Graham used in his post, it was important to me that he, and anyone else who may have misunderstood, knew that I had and do not now have any reason to believe that Board meetings occurred during the time of his tenure as director to which he was not provided proper notice.
That issue was raised by you...
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
