News Focus
News Focus
icon url

All-Bidness

06/06/16 12:05 PM

#151763 RE: es1 #151762

What don't you get exactly?

There are 3 members that make decisions, all equal. Dan and Otto can out vote Scott, and most likely will, so therefore Scott doesn't have control.
icon url

Tar sands

06/06/16 12:07 PM

#151764 RE: es1 #151762

Factually you are quite correct. It should also be noted that Scott Keevil, and associated entities, are very substantial creditors of the Company which provides another layer of control over Corporate activities.
icon url

jjgarcia

06/06/16 3:45 PM

#151777 RE: es1 #151762

You statement is a contradiction in itself.

First you claim that as a director on the board he has no power. Then you say you want them to do what's right. Does he have the power to do what you want him to do or not.

He is there because there were enough shareholders and shares to get him there. Action had to be taken to get Cam out and Otto in. Can you explain the change any other way? If so please enlighten us.

I have been in SRSR for years. At this point I have very little to lose so even baby steps are appreciated. I think people that want to "LOL" and "Not make this stuff up" should take a step back and see what the new board will bring.

The excuse that is being used that they don't want to see other investors suckered in to SRSR is phony. I haven't seen anyone touting SRSR as a great buy.