Replies to post #29633 on Tauriga Sciences Inc (fka TAUG)

[diannedawn]

Well Gee Seth...

Not a penny of the $80,000 receieved from Group 10 Holdings into Tauriga during mid July 2015 was ever applied towards the Typenex settlement.

I have made this clear and I am tired of continuing to listen to this

The Typenex settlement was extinguished by the Company for $230,000 on June 2, 2015. And a press release was issued by the Company.

If this payment had already been received by Typenex on June 2, 2015 then obviously money that Came in a month and a half later was NOT used to make a payment towards something that was paid in full a month and a half earlier.

This is called common sense 101. I have made this clear repeatedly and I am sick of these games.

The Company was required to raise $80,000 from Group 10 in mid July 2015 because it cost about $25,000 in legal and Broadridge costs to compete the Proxy and the previous CEO took about $50,000 of the Company's cash for "severance" when she left the Company on July 9, 2015.

Clearly there was no money from this $80,000 paid towards Typenex. Non-sense

THIS IS THE FIRST TIME YOU MADE ANY ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN...
Can I tell the SEC that you LIED in this filing then?
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1142790/000149315215003021/def14a.htm

AS I SAID MANY MONTHS AGO >>>I AM NOT MAKING THAT WORDING UP<<<
IT COMES DIRECTLY FROM YOUR FILING!
"On July 14, 2015, the Company entered into a Convertible Debenture with Group 10 Holdings, LLC (“Group 10”) in the principal amount of $96,000 with a maturity date of July 14, 2016 (the “Group 10 Note”). The Company received gross proceeds of $80,000 under the Group Note. The proceeds from the Group 10 Note were used for the payment under the Final Settlement Agreement. The Company granted Group 10 15,000,000 commitment shares of common stock in consideration of the Group 10 Note."

NOTHING ABOUT LEGAL/PROXY/SEVERENCE COSTS IN THE FILING!!!
AND you NEVER made ANY attempt before today to explain.

WHICH is WHY you have NO CREDIBILITY.

How much simpler would it have been,
to just give this explanation back in JULY/AUGUST?
Maybe even apologize for the INCORRECT INFORMATION in the FILING?
I mean...you ARE all about "correcting misinformation"...right?

ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS.

[deafelephant]

Just curious, why would you add a pumper from IHUB to your board of directors? what was your reason other than the fact that he's here everyday pumping your stocks evven though his filings show that while he's pumping, he's selling off his shares.

And because this is public infORmation, the pumper is TJG aka Tom Graham that you mentioned in your PRs. TJG has often ended his posts with "Tom Graham" so I know they are the one and same.

What does Tom Graham do for TAUG?

[diannedawn]

FURTHERMORE...

Also please cease and desist from stating that the Company knew of the PCAOB Censure prior to July 23, 2015 as that is competely false in every way. Or perhaps you wish to share with the Board your evidence to suggest that which corroborates such a wild and inaccurate contention

PLEASE SHOW ME WHERE I SAID THIS.
PROVIDE ME WITH A QUOTE.

All I've said is that you CLAIM you did not know...
and at times I may have said that I do not believe you.
HERE IS WHAT I REALLY SAID (in the post you replied too)

2. The vote was set for the 27th.
Seth has CLAIMED repeatedly, that TAUG was clueless about the Cowan mess until "July 23rd"...
We have no way of KNOWING if this is true or false...we are just supposed to accept it.

Note that the 23rd IS before the 27th...
Note that while the SEC gives company's "4 days" to file "material events", that there is nothing to preclude them from filing the information earlier...say on Friday July 24th.
Or AT LEAST by Monday the 27th, so the SHAREholders could have this information available.

DID IT HAPPEN?
NOPE!

In Fact...WHEN DID the SHAREholders learn the WHOLE TRUTH???
Was it in THIS?
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tauriga-sciences-inc-granted-7-204955800.html
July 29th?
NOPE!

It was July 31st!
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tauriga-sciences-inc-comments-status-120000855.html

Of course, THOSE were just PR's, not SEC filings...
the actual 8k
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1142790/000149315215003352/0001493152-15-003352-index.htm
"Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 29, 2015"
was filed August 4th!

"100% transparent"???

SO WHAT.
My not believing you is an OPINION.
I don't believe ANYTHING you say because your WORD is not worth diddly,
as has been SHOWN MANY TIMES.

DO YOU HAVE ANY FACTS TO SUPPORT ANYTHING YOU CLAIM???
How many times have you falsely accused me of "slander" on here?

[rawman]

Tauriga delisting that was a direct result of the malpractice.

This a completely blatant misstatement! Tauriga Sciences had previously been warned of the potential OTC DE-LISTING, much before any public announcement related to the Cowan PCAOB findings!

Simply...long prior to the announced action against the auditior, TAUG was informed that it was NO LONGER IN COMPLIANCE with the OTCQB listing requirements. For Seth Shaw, the Cowan action has proven to be extremely "convenient" way of defend himself and TAUG! Check it out...TAUG shares were selling for less than a penny and did not meet clearly stated OTCQB listing requirements! TAUG had not consistently traded above one cent since March 2015 and the Cowan sanctions were "recognized" by Shaw and TAUG four months later in late July 2015!

Citing the Cowan auditing error as the sole reason for TAUG's DOWNGRADE TO "PINK" ON THE OTC, IS SETH SHAW'S CONTRIVED FANTASY LAND! Perhaps Shaw overlooked reading the warning letters from the OTC!

[diannedawn]

So Mr. BSeth, can you see why I don't believe this statement?
"The Company had absolutely no knowledge that the Predecessor Audit Firm had violated these SEC rules prior to receiving the Order and the Predecessor Audit Firm did not provide the Company any notice that they may have violated SEC independence rules or that they may have been under investigation for the violation of these rules."
When you put out an 8k with this statement
"On April 11, 2016, the management of Tauriga Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) became aware of a misstatement in its Definitive Schedule 14A"
And there is PROOF in the post history that this is not true?
Do you need me to re-post all the links?
I can.