Replies to post #10008 on KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (fka KEYO)

[Poptech]

lesn: CCRA did not register a reverse merger. CCRA already owned Nates so CCRA could not be a shell company. It would be a little like saying Nantworks is a shell company. Nate's, a division of CCRA, bought back Nate's by issuing preferred shares to CCRA.

Nate’s Pancakes was acquired through the issuance of 148,155 Series B Preferred Stock.

Nates was the registrant, not CCRA. Your proposal would be like Nanthealth do a 'reverse merger' with Nantworks in order to get rid of Nantworks and their management.
However, there is absolutely no similarity between these company and Keyon or Nantworks:
-Neither CCRA or Nates was previously dissolved.
-Keyon doesn't own Nantworks.
-Nantworks is not trying to distance itself from Keyon.
-Nantworks will not be giving Keyon shares to go away.
-Nantworks will not be trying to get out from under Keyon's management and ownership.
-Keyon is not trading.
-CCRA and Nates did not do a RTM.
The one similarity with the Keyon RTM, Nates is a scam.

A whole week of new fallacies we should catalog in a new Scam Wrapup Friday!

[lesnshawn]

Just answer the questions, Popt. lns_eom

[janice shell]

Was CCRA (Capital Resource Alliance, Inc.) registered w/ the SEC w/ they reverse merged w/ NHMD (Nates Food Co., Inc.)?

No. CCRA had voluntarily deregistered in February 2014. On 19 May, the company merged with Nate's Pancakes. On 29 July, Nate's filed a Form 10 to reregister with the SEC.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1409446/000109635011000021/form15.htm

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1409446/000147793214003927/nate_1012g.htm

What's any of that got to do with KEYO? CCRA was not dissolved. While still an active company, it merged with Nate's. Nate's was interested in the shell because it was a PUBLIC company. Unlike KEYO, it had not been dissolved and deleted.

Another question: has this turned into the Aerosol Pancake board?