KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (fka KEYO)

[Poptech]

lesn: CCRA did not register a reverse merger. CCRA already owned Nates so CCRA could not be a shell company. It would be a little like saying Nantworks is a shell company. Nate's, a division of CCRA, bought back Nate's by issuing preferred shares to CCRA.

Nate’s Pancakes was acquired through the issuance of 148,155 Series B Preferred Stock.

Nates was the registrant, not CCRA. Your proposal would be like Nanthealth do a 'reverse merger' with Nantworks in order to get rid of Nantworks and their management.
However, there is absolutely no similarity between these company and Keyon or Nantworks:
-Neither CCRA or Nates was previously dissolved.
-Keyon doesn't own Nantworks.
-Nantworks is not trying to distance itself from Keyon.
-Nantworks will not be giving Keyon shares to go away.
-Nantworks will not be trying to get out from under Keyon's management and ownership.
-Keyon is not trading.
-CCRA and Nates did not do a RTM.
The one similarity with the Keyon RTM, Nates is a scam.

A whole week of new fallacies we should catalog in a new Scam Wrapup Friday!