News Focus
News Focus
icon url

AlfonszyD

04/07/16 12:53 PM

#316794 RE: Poptech #316793

Good day Pop,

I think I'd have to disagree with the assumption this is going to stop trading in 90days. The shares are terminated, the registration. But that doesn't mean they are delisted and can't trade on the stinky pinks for years. They are worthless non-the less.

The crew on here that was promoting KEYO now (who knows the agenda) some might be familiar with.
Keyo filed the exact same Form 15 in 2011. Only to trade thru 2014

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1335294/000143774911009778/keyon_form15-122311.htm
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1022701/000114420416082536/v430844_15-12g.htm



Rule 12g-4(a)(1) x
Rule 12g-4(a)(2) ¨
Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(i) x
Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(ii) ¨
Rule 15d-6 ¨
icon url

Personalizit

04/07/16 3:33 PM

#316798 RE: Poptech #316793

What happens to the shorted shares?
icon url

lesnshawn

04/11/16 12:45 PM

#316806 RE: Poptech #316793

Popt: "Share termination". You made that up.

What do you mean by share termination that since that's a concocted term that doesn't really exist?

Are you suggesting that your made-up term, "share termination", has the same meaning as "shares cancellation"?

What was actually terminated w/ the Form 15 filing in your mind?

Do you see the word, "REGISTRATION" in the Form 15? What does that mean to you?

Why does a company register its securities w/ the SEC to begin with?

Can a stock exist if it's not registered first w/ the SEC?

What do you claim will happen to the NEOM sharesholders' stock in their accounts now that you say they've been supposedly "terminated"?

These are important questions you need to directly answer if you're going to continue to sling about claims of NEOM share termination.

lns