News Focus
News Focus
icon url

tonv

04/06/16 4:33 AM

#56449 RE: Tmyz #56448

How easy can it be? I take it that Mr Schadel has evidence of the note amendment. Then why not ask Tailwind for proof of selling part of the note to Maese. If it is provided, then pay Maese his 15k. If not, we know he's a fraud.
As a co-owner I would like to prevent lawsuits that aren't necessary. They cost a lot of money which can be used for far better causes.
icon url

stevenmaese

04/06/16 10:00 AM

#56505 RE: Tmyz #56448

I have no shorted shares.

As of Schadel's periscope on Friday, less than a week ago, he said Labor Smart has just over 1,700 shareholders.

Please talk to an attorney about suing. The questions you would need to ask are A) What fiduciary duty does Steve Maese owe Labor Smart? (Answer: Nothing) B) What untrue information has Steve Maese disseminated about Labor Smart? (Answer: Nothing)

I have no fear of a lawsuit because I've done nothing improper.
icon url

stevenmaese

04/06/16 10:02 AM

#56508 RE: Tmyz #56448

And yes, I deny that any forbearance agreement exists pertaining to the note Prometheus holds. There is no forbearance agreement. Moreover, I don't believe Ryan ever said that one exists for the Prometheus note.