News Focus
News Focus
icon url

stock-trace

07/18/06 7:58 PM

#32777 RE: GLENO34 #32775

guys-

i find this topic very interesting, indeed. right and wrong are in reference to what constant...no answers but some intersting questions...

i'd like to know your take on the nag hamadi and other apocryphal texts. i think it is prudent and incumbent on any christian to carefully consider the implications of this, as well as the events and history of the first several hundered years of christianity. how much is heresay and how much isn/t.

another thing i find interesting- julius caesar wrote many works that we can ascertain to this day - talking about gaellic campaigns, politics, heck even grammar- he invented the term "ablative". there are no contemporaneous accounts of jesus from a part of the world that wwas quite literate. that gets us back to the second paragraph.

why do you think it was so important to bury those texts, away from the roman catholic church authorities. what are the imnplications of that text with regards to the divinity of jesus. could it be that jusus as not a god but a man like everyone else, a prophet nonetheless, but still a man. could this christian view have been in contrast to the roman church teachings wihch sought to deify the man in order to fit the need for a reviously pagan society to have an anthropomorphic god before them to more easily convert these same masses to a more pagan friendly version of the true religion of christianity, ( which we do not know of in today's world) which then would not have been very different from judiasm or islam? but instread was more similar to mithriasm and pagan practices which was so prevalent at the time? what do you think about the birth of jesus on the 25th, a sacred date in the pagan calender,
interesting to say the least....

there are many cultures with the concept of divine incarnation or anthropomorphication of god- the virgin birth, and sacrifice n the parto of the god for the sake of huanity. sound familiear? etc are all recurring themes in mithriasm( mitra), hinduism (Krishna) - read "kristna", osiris and isis in egyptology, etc...


st





icon url

cruzship

07/18/06 8:12 PM

#32778 RE: GLENO34 #32775

Gleno, the stories contained in the bible are hand picked by the politicos of the era. All of the gnostic writings were excluded and those may indeed be the ones that Jesus the Christ believed in the most and wanted handed down to the "believers". How would you know which were His teachings and which were those chosen for you by mere political hacks of the time of the compiling of the bible?

It is very akin to believing what Bush is saying as opposed to using your own eyes and ears to discern the truth in the world. The only reason anyone would believe just one source of information is because that person is lazy.

Time to wake up and see the world for what it is and not what some political hack is telling you to see. See for yourself otherwise you are a pawn of the politicos and fodder for their cannon. Take the time to discover the truth through a variety of sources. Study many inputs. Do not be spoon fed the "truth" by any politician unless you are willing to give your freedom and offspring for their monetary and political gain.
icon url

farooq

07/18/06 8:13 PM

#32779 RE: GLENO34 #32775

Gleno34,
O/T,
How do you know that I do not love Jesus, May be I love him more then you do, Quran is not saying any thing against him. Bible is not all real Jesus word any more at this time that is difference between Islam and Christianity, like the story of Prostitute many stories added and deleted; and things allowed which were forbidden in original version. I do not do good things for 72 virgins, I do it because my God said so and he will be happy with me on judgment day. My goal is to achieve happiness of my God that include respecting all people and religions because he created them otherwise it was easy for him to create on religion and one color. I hope you make tons of money in your stocks, Good luck to you.
Farooq
icon url

KovuLK

07/19/06 12:20 AM

#32788 RE: GLENO34 #32775

OT: GLENO34 re: religions of the world


GLEANO, since I think I started this conversation with my post this morning please indulge my post now. I did think about waiting until the weekend but the issue is burning within me. So MUCH APOLOGIES to those offended by the OT post. Please feel free to move on now to the next post if you wish too.

As well, this is what I found to be good for me to understand.

The Christian faith says that there are three levels of Revelation within the human experience, that is events, not the Bible book. What I mean is that there is 'revelation' within nature, the prophets/law, and Jesus. Now think about this. What view of God does man have within each level of revelation?? If he stays within the first level of nature then he can become a nature worshiper or Pantheist. What he knows is totally what he can perceive, study, analyze and postulate about from physical evidence in the world around him. He may even extend god-like qualities to this and 'worship' it. Not very personal is it, I am relating to an 'it'?? If he moves on to the words of the prophet(s) then he has a Word from God, but he has just words, codified oftentimes in a code of conduct or worship. He has the Law and is bound by it. He may even extend god-like qualities to this and demand that others obey and follow and 'worship' it. Not very personal is it, I am relating to an 'it'?? If he moves on to Jesus then he has God himself. God himself speaking to and walking with the people?? That sounds personal to me, it sounds relational. And this is where the struggle began and continues. You should know that the struggles that people have today with Jesus are the same as they were two thousand years ago. There was an immense theological conversation within the early church over the aspects of whether he was God or man or somehow both, pre-extistance, incarnation, sinlessness, resurrection, atonement, faith, etc. They had conversation about the Holy Spirit and his continuation in a personal and real way in our lives since the physical event of Jesus. And the Holy Ghost is another subject of great depth. Some of the concepts the church defended against were labeled, such as adoptionism, subordination, sabellianism, modalism, docetism, ebionist, etc, etc. Each had the approach to either render Jesus as a mere man with no resurrection/atonement ability or as all spirit with no substitution ability. That is, bring Jesus down to our human level and keep him there or say that he was a spirit and not real anyway. It is not too difficult to see where the contentions come about. Most of these are resurrected today in some form or another with their sponsors unaware of the early ecumenical councils of Nicea (325ad), Constantinople (381ad), Ephesus (431ad), Chalcedon (451ad) and the decisions that were made. But it was out of this crucible that the centrality of the doctrine of Christ was established. Much of the result can be summed up as to who Jesus was via the "Apostles Creed". Were there 'politics of the times' as a influencing factor?? Sure, they did not operate in a vacuum. But to say the results are somehow errant is to say that God cannot activate his Will because of this or in spite of this. Not a very big God if thats true. Were there also issues regarding other writings concerning Jesus and those that would be included in the New Testament canon?? Sure. The decision regarding them was based primarily upon the consistancy of themes that were accepted doctrine due to the conversations above and who wrote them. This is a whole other vast issue on which much has been written. Is Christianity perfect?? No, Peter said to the lame begger at the temple gate, "silver and gold have I none but what I have I give you in the name of Jesus, rise up and walk" (Acts 3:6ff). Unfortunately the church has silver and gold but do we have Jesus?? But isn't that what its all about?? Sin and Redemption?? The perfect substituting for the imperfect?? I like the analogy said by my evangelism professor, "Christianity is one begger telling another where bread can be found". Are there parallels to other religious, mythology stories?? Sure. There are non-Hebrew, non-Christian parallels in abundance for Bible stories. However, there are differences in theme regarding the redemptive work and character of God and man, as well as oftentimes unnoticed detail differences. Consider this detail, the 'virgin birth' is a misnomer and should really be the 'virgin conception'. Jesus was born as other men are but not conceived as other men are. And finally, what are we to make of the resurrection?? Did it happen?? Did the disciples or Romans steal the body, did he recover himself after his crucifixtion because he merely passed out, did the disciples lie about him?? If not what are we to do with this empty tomb, this resurrected Jesus?? Jesus was not just another type, he was different in kind. And all of this is with the background of Judaism. You cannot understand this without understanding the Judaism that Christianity came out of; God's creation as the Hebrews saw his handiwork and the Law and the Prophets as they wrote about him. The archeologically sound Old Testement has much prophecy, and some of it is for him. So we have come full circle.

Bottom line. Its about faith and following, as opposed to 'unbelief'. There are excuses a plenty for dismissing him and I do not contend with any man over it. It is each ones decision; 'no decision' is still a decision. I have lived long enough to know what I believe and why I believe it, and to agree to disagree.

Anyway, thats just my small take on it. This is the 'cliff notes' of the 'cliff notes' of the 'cliff notes'. I would strongly recommend some readings in church history, particularly the early church, and theologians. I would be so bold as to recommend the following. Emil Brunner's books such as his three volume Dogmatics and his book, Man in Revolt. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, primarily known for his, Cost of Discipleship. For some good story telling, Charles H Spurgeon, Around the Wicket Gate. As a fun and challenging reading, Charles Sheldon, In His Steps. As fun reading with a surprise, Barbara Robinson, The Best Christmas Pageant Ever. They can be found on Amazon.com. They tell about Christianity as it is supposed to be understood and lived. You will not be the same afterwards.

Thanks and good nite to all,
gym is in less than six hours,
kovu