Replies to post #53381 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[TheGreatSwami]

"Disappointed that it appears the participants didn't request another Part B extension."

wait, none of the 32 trial participants requested an extention?

[Miss Australia]

Not sure what you mean about another Part B extension? The participants all have an extension that will provide a full 12 month period.

I understand that it has already been indicated that further extensions may be introduced as more results become available, if positive.

Obviously one of the big concerns the participants have is that is this drug is successful/beneficial they don't want to be taken off it. The researchers don't want this either and it makes sense to continue the core group to monitor longer term results.

[Millstone]

How would we know that no participants had requested a further extension? All subjects requested a 26 week extension, and I think only a few would be at or near 52 weeks at this point.

[XenaLives]

It appears that this statement comes from an alternate reality.

Disappointed that it appears the participants didn't request another Part B extension.

It certainly doesn't conform to the facts on record.

[viperdeal]

High Risk Extreme Reward so I'm sticking around. Has anything negative been proven about the science? NO. Has Missling mislead investors? NO

So whats next? Opportunity to double down?

Grant? Probably
Partner? Lock
PH3? Lock
Epilepsy? Probably
Patent? soon
MJFF?
Media?
Insty?
Clowns? always

Taking a calculated risk is that the same as being rational?