Replies to post #25843 on iTalk Inc. (fka TALK)

[Mike24_Pr]

It wouldn't be TALK, UMS is entitled to 85% of the common stock, which they could've bought back without anyome knowing anything right after the merger . Again NOT TALK not the "issuer". The "issuer" wouldn't be buying the shares, But UMS is that clear? Enough?

[lloydm]

What is stopping UMS from buying the shares on the open market, then retiring them after the merger?